Would you agree that the “depths of oppression” create “heights of character”? How does Mandela illustrate this? Can you add your own examples to this argument?
Writing Prompts –
- Begin by stating your stance on the statement. For example, you could say, “I agree that the depths of oppression can indeed lead to the development of heights of character.“
- Next, explain how Nelson Mandela illustrates this concept. You could mention his experience as a political prisoner for 27 years during the apartheid regime in South Africa.
- Then, support your argument with your own examples. You could mention historical figures or individuals.
- Conclude by reiterating your position and summarizing the key points of your argument.
Sample Answer –
Yes, I agree that the “depths of oppression” can create “heights of character.” Nelson Mandela’s life is a perfect illustration of this concept. During his 27-year political imprisonment in apartheid-era South Africa, he faced extreme adversity and harsh conditions. However, he remained resilient and committed to his principles of equality, justice, and non-violence. His time in prison led him to cultivate immense strength of character and an unwavering determination to fight for freedom and equality.
Bhagat Singh, an Indian freedom fighter, illustrates this well. Despite facing immense oppression during British colonial rule, Singh remained resolute in his fight for India’s independence. He fearlessly stood against injustice and sacrificed his life for the cause at a young age.
In conclusion, when people endure and overcome oppression, it often leads to the development of strong and admirable character traits, inspiring others to follow their path of courage and determination.
If you disagree with the above phrase, you can add examples of –
- Sanjay Dutt – Indian Actor
- Rani Padmavati of Mewar – see below
- BhadurShah Jafar
- Marilyn Monroe Hollywood Actress
| EXTRA READING |
| Can I write an answer showing my disagreement with the given line? |
| yes, of course, you can if you have enough writing material for it. While it is true that some individuals may develop strength and resilience in the face of oppression, not everyone responds to adversity in the same way. Oppression can have deeply damaging effects on people, leading to trauma, hopelessness, and loss of character. Regarding Mandela’s illustration, while he showed remarkable strength during his imprisonment, his experience cannot be generalized to everyone facing oppression. Many individuals oppressed by systemic injustices do not necessarily emerge with heightened character. For instance, consider children living in war-torn regions or victims of long-term abuse. Their experiences of oppression may lead to significant psychological harm, hindering character development. In conclusion, while some people may find inner strength amidst oppression, it is essential to recognize that the impact of oppression on character varies greatly, and not everyone may rise above it to find “heights of character.” |
How to write about Rani Padmavati –
Let’s take the example of Rani Padmini, also known as Padmavati, a legendary queen of the Indian kingdom of Mewar. According to historical accounts and legends, she faced immense oppression during the siege of her kingdom by Alauddin Khilji, a ruler of the Delhi Sultanate.
During the siege, the queen and the women of the court faced the threat of capture and dishonour. In the face of this oppression, Rani Padmini and other women chose to perform “jauhar,” an act of self-immolation, to protect their honour and avoid capture by the enemy.
While this act may be seen as a display of bravery and sacrifice, it also illustrates the tragic consequences of extreme oppression. Rani Padmini’s decision to perform “Jauhar” arose from the depths of the oppression they faced during the siege, but it does not necessarily signify a development of “heights of character.”
This example demonstrates that oppression can sometimes lead to devastating choices rather than enhancing one’s character. It shows that the impact of oppression can vary greatly, and it is not always a source of positive transformation or resilience.